Title: EDH Compatibility Issues
This is an EpiDoc UserStory
Summary
- There are features of the EpiDoc Guidelines that need to be made compatible with the EDH/EAGLE database model.
Examples
- InsAph has created a series of <rs> elements that allow conversion from our EpiDoc files to EDH format via a simple crosswalker. Should these elements be (a) standardised? (b) recommended? (c) recognised by EDH? (d) required?
- Measurements in particular are going to need special handling to be compatible with EDH model (where measurements are numerical fields, so cannot contain "circa", ranges, etc.)
- typologies and controlled vocabularies need to develop in tandem
Dependencies and rules
- A conversation with the folks at EDH/EAGLE is a sine qua non
- Some of these issues need answered before the first draft of LeidenFinalisation can be considered complete. (I assert.)
Questions
Acceptance Tests
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.